Pro organ donation essay

The reasons used against organ donation vary according to the individual because it is mostly a personal decision. Some opponents of organ donation cite religious reasons for not donating organs, whereas others cite that their family beliefs disagree with the intent of becoming a donor. For instance, some religious affiliations hold the belief that donating organs could affect the afterlife of an individual. Similarly, organ donation serves to impair the hopes of recovery in one way or another. Other religions and individuals prefer cremation instead of donating tissues, organs and body. Secondly, opponents of organ donation cite the fear of unethical purchase and selling of organs. It is a fact that a black market exists for some organs such as kidneys. Unethical trade in organs is prevalent in Iran, Pakistan, China, Ukraine and Bosnia, where most of the people are poor. In the US, selling organs is outlawed. However, organ donation can be a powerful tool for curbing unethical trade of organs and tissues and its associated implications such as infection and transplant rejection. Bramstedt (112) argues that an increase in legitimate organ donation will play a considerable role in cutting the demand for transplant tourism, which would in turn lead to significant benefits for donors and recipients. Most Americans are not willing to donate organs simply because they lack the knowledge associated with the procedure. It is apparent that most of the “perceived” cons of donating organs are grounded on misconception. For example, many people falsely believe that they have to incur the cost of donating an organ or that their family will have to incur the expenses of organ removal (Green 114). This is a fallacy because organ donation is utterly free and all costs are transferred to the recipient. Similarly, many individuals are avoiding organ donation on the fear that it will have an impact on their medical treatment. They hold the belief that doctors cannot try their best to find them if they are discovered to be potential donors. Again, this is a fallacy because surgeons engaged in organ donations are not the same with those involved in saving patients. The fact is that the life of the patient in front of them is ultimately crucial. According to Brezina (114), another fallacy that discourages potential donors is the misconception that organ donation leads to medical complications for the case of the donor. The reality is that organ donation has not effect on the donor’s life even after recovering. For example, kidney donors do not face any complications because the remaining kidney enlarges and functions normally. The case is the same for liver donation because it can regenerate and get back to full operation (Cherry 121).

This imbalance reflects an increase in multiple-organ donation... The only way to obtain human organs and tissues is by donation from a human being... Besides benefiting others, organ donors also benefit themselves, particularly in a marked increase in self-esteem... Risks and Benefits to the Recipient The risks and benefits to transplant recipients from living donors depend mainly on the organ in question, the prospects for success, and the possibility of using a different kind of therapy, including cadaver donation... Possibility and Validity of Consent Can a donor, while under p...

Pro organ donation essay

pro organ donation essay


pro organ donation essaypro organ donation essaypro organ donation essaypro organ donation essay